UK healthcare should be retained as publicly funded service, doctor argues

A Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health professor has said that a growing proportion of public monies are not going into front-line healthcare, but into profit margins.

Neena Modi has argued in the BMJ that a mixed public-private healthcare system “ultimately reduces the effectiveness of healthcare for everyone” and that it makes sense to retain UK healthcare as a primarily publicly funded, delivered and accountable service to ensure equity, effectiveness and cost-efficiency.

While an increased number of for-profit and other independent sector organisations have started offering healthcare services in England, there is no evidence that healthcare is better when delivered by non-NHS providers. Indeed evidence to-date indicates care is compromised when organisations with no prior experience of local contexts take over from NHS providers.

Some say the growth in private for-profit healthcare will take the pressure off the NHS, but Modi argues that in the UK “the overwhelming majority of doctors work in the NHS; take them away and the NHS, already reeling from the adverse impact of Brexit on migrant workers, suffers further.”

The NHS doesn’t need to be discarded, nor does it need to go back in time; it needs to evolve, she writes.

She calls for “visionary leadership” to translate its founding principles into 21st century healthcare, and “investment coupled with equitable cost-containment” for example through further development of pioneering mechanisms initiated by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence.

The UK has also long punched above its weight in biomedical and life sciences research “but now needs to address its weakness in exploiting this for public gain,” she argues.

And wiser public-private partnerships than the NHS has hitherto seen “could stimulate innovation directed primarily at health and wellbeing from infancy into old age, rather than disease and profit.”

Government must be honest, the media must explain, the public must protest, and the professions must speak out, she concludes. “If we do not, future generations pondering upon the demise of the NHS, will be legitimate in asking whether our silence reflected ignorance, denial, fear, or self-interest.”

About the author

Shawn Symonds

Shawn Symonds

Seven years in pharmaceuticals has given Shawn immense exposure in everything related to medicines, drugs, chemicals and related sectors – at least from the PR front. Through his insider access to the sector, he has gained valuable insight into the entire manufacturing process of medicines and vaccines.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment